Barriers and Facilitators of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Mid-Atlantic Latinos: Focus Group Findings

To examine patient and provider barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among mid-Atlantic Latinos seeking care at urban primary care clinics and describe implications for the design of interventions in primary care. Nine focus groups were conducted with 70 Latino patients and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ethnicity & disease 2006, Vol.16 (1), p.255-261
Hauptverfasser: Goodman, Michelle J., Ogdie, Alexis, Kanamori, Mariano J., Cañar, Janet, O’Malley, Ann S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To examine patient and provider barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among mid-Atlantic Latinos seeking care at urban primary care clinics and describe implications for the design of interventions in primary care. Nine focus groups were conducted with 70 Latino patients and 27 primary care providers. Content analysis of focus group transcripts was performed using established qualitative techniques. Comments on CRC screening fell into 10 content areas: primary care site or provider characteristics (25% patient/21% provider comments); knowledge (18% patient/12% provider comments); cost/insurance coverage (10%/25%); attitudes (14%/7%); ordering of priorities (10%/11%); language (12%/7%); procedural issues regarding screenings (8%/10%); discrimination (2%/1%); and issues related to being a new immigrant (.2%/6%). Patient lack of understanding of the screening test procedures, inadequate knowledge about colorectal cancer, inadequate numbers of Spanish-speaking providers, and the cost of screening were most often cited as barriers by patients. Both providers and patients repeatedly mentioned the lack of funding and referral sources for colonoscopy as a key barrier to performing screening, even with lower-cost fecal occult blood tests, as colonoscopy follow-up would not be available. Patients favored receiving CRC screening recommendations from their usual continuity physician, but were open to receiving information on test procedures and indications from a Spanish-speaking health educator. Efforts to improve funding and availability of colonoscopy for low-income persons could proceed in tandem with linguistically and culturally appropriate clinic-based efforts to improve CRC screening among Latinos.
ISSN:1049-510X