A Reevaluation of "Psychiatric Help" When Divorce Impends
Psychotherapeutic intervention on one side or another in a marriage when divorce is being considered may serve to destroy the possibility of reconciliation. Despite the therapist's efforts to remain neutral, he inevitably finds himself thrust into the role of catalyst, judge, or "alternate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of psychiatry 1969-11, Vol.126 (5), p.611-618 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Psychotherapeutic intervention on one side or another in a marriage when divorce is being considered may serve to destroy the possibility of reconciliation. Despite the therapist's efforts to remain neutral, he inevitably finds himself thrust into the role of catalyst, judge, or "alternate mate." The authors suggest the inclusion of both partners, as well as children and perhaps other family members, in the therapeutic situation as one means of avoiding an outcome that may ultimately prove detrimental to all. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-953X 1535-7228 |
DOI: | 10.1176/ajp.126.5.611 |