Getting to No: A Study of Settlement Negotiations and the Selection of Cases for Trial

Although trial is often celebrated as the centerpiece of the US system of justice, it is not only an uncommon method of resolving disputes, but also a disfavored one. Most legal scholars, along with judges and attorneys, agree that pretrial settlement is always cheaper, faster, and better than trial...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Michigan law review 1991-11, Vol.90 (2), p.319-393
Hauptverfasser:	Gross, Samuel R., Syverud, Kent D.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Attorneys Civil proceedings Commerce - legislation & jurisprudence Consumer Product Safety - legislation & jurisprudence Data Collection Defendants Disputes Evaluation Studies as Topic Fees and Charges - statistics & numerical data Health administration Injuries Juries Liability Liability, Legal - economics Litigation Malpractice - legislation & jurisprudence Negligence Negotiating Negotiations Personal injury damages Physicians - legislation & jurisprudence Plaintiffs Plaintiffs attorneys Pretrial discovery Priests Settlement Settlements & damages Statistical data Torts Trials United States Verdicts
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!