Class and family
This paper seeks to make a contribution to debates on ‘class analysis’, as well as exploring the role of the family in class reproduction. A broad distinction is drawn between primarily ‘economic’ and primarily ‘culturalist’ accounts of class reproduction. It is argued that despite their differences...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Sociological review (Keele) 2006-11, Vol.54 (4), p.658-677 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 677 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 658 |
| container_title | The Sociological review (Keele) |
| container_volume | 54 |
| creator | Crompton, Rosemary |
| description | This paper seeks to make a contribution to debates on ‘class analysis’, as well as exploring the role of the family in class reproduction. A broad distinction is drawn between primarily ‘economic’ and primarily ‘culturalist’ accounts of class reproduction. It is argued that despite their differences, these accounts also share many similarities. In particular, both approaches identify the role of the family as central to the reproduction of class. However, economic and cultural accounts cannot be integrated into a single ‘theory’, one reason being that the mechanisms whereby economic and cultural capital are transmitted are different. Nevertheless, economic and cultural approaches may be (and should be) used in combination with each other in order to develop a full account of the reproduction of class inequalities. In developing these arguments, a critique is offered of current theories of ‘individualisation’ in relation to class and the family. The argument is illustrated by two ‘worked examples’; teenage motherhood, and the patterning of mothers’ employment. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00665.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_838990118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1111_j.1467-954X.2006.00665.x</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1244364731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5185-a702e593e2e40c984bd46eb584d47e06ca62d407f5ac1f0e273850ee992f991c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKAzEUhoMoWC_gIxQXuprx5J4sXEit9YYFq1TcHOI0I1OnFycW27c3dUTEhTUQEsj3nXPyE9KkkNK4joYpFUonVoqHlAGoNG4l0_kaaXw_rJMGADcJMEU3yVYIQwCgTOkG2WuVLoSmGw-auRsV5WKHbOSuDH7369wm92ftu9Z5ct3tXLROrpNMUiMTp4F5ablnXkBmjXgaCOWfpBEDoT2ozCk2EKBz6TKag2eaGwneW8tya2nGt8lhXXdaTV5nPrzhqAiZL0s39pNZQMONtUCpieTBn6SiCgTnaiUodSQl1RHc_wUOJ7NqHL-LNA5omWY2QqaGsmoSQuVznFbFyFULpIDL6HGIy4RxmTAuo8fP6HEe1eNafS9Kv_i3h73ubTveoi9rP7hn_2O21X2T2ivCm59_93XVCyrNtcT-TQc78Hh6JS772OMfuEClqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199292729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Class and family</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Crompton, Rosemary</creator><creatorcontrib>Crompton, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><description>This paper seeks to make a contribution to debates on ‘class analysis’, as well as exploring the role of the family in class reproduction. A broad distinction is drawn between primarily ‘economic’ and primarily ‘culturalist’ accounts of class reproduction. It is argued that despite their differences, these accounts also share many similarities. In particular, both approaches identify the role of the family as central to the reproduction of class. However, economic and cultural accounts cannot be integrated into a single ‘theory’, one reason being that the mechanisms whereby economic and cultural capital are transmitted are different. Nevertheless, economic and cultural approaches may be (and should be) used in combination with each other in order to develop a full account of the reproduction of class inequalities. In developing these arguments, a critique is offered of current theories of ‘individualisation’ in relation to class and the family. The argument is illustrated by two ‘worked examples’; teenage motherhood, and the patterning of mothers’ employment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-954X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00665.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SORVA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Class ; Cultural Capital ; Culture ; Employment ; Families ; Families & family life ; Family ; Family studies ; Inequalities ; Inequality ; Parenthood ; Social Class ; Social classes ; Social Mobility ; Socialization ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Sociology ; Theory ; Values</subject><ispartof>The Sociological review (Keele), 2006-11, Vol.54 (4), p.658-677</ispartof><rights>2006 The Editorial Board of The Sociological Review</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Nov 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5185-a702e593e2e40c984bd46eb584d47e06ca62d407f5ac1f0e273850ee992f991c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5185-a702e593e2e40c984bd46eb584d47e06ca62d407f5ac1f0e273850ee992f991c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00665.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00665.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,30981,33755,33756,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crompton, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><title>Class and family</title><title>The Sociological review (Keele)</title><description>This paper seeks to make a contribution to debates on ‘class analysis’, as well as exploring the role of the family in class reproduction. A broad distinction is drawn between primarily ‘economic’ and primarily ‘culturalist’ accounts of class reproduction. It is argued that despite their differences, these accounts also share many similarities. In particular, both approaches identify the role of the family as central to the reproduction of class. However, economic and cultural accounts cannot be integrated into a single ‘theory’, one reason being that the mechanisms whereby economic and cultural capital are transmitted are different. Nevertheless, economic and cultural approaches may be (and should be) used in combination with each other in order to develop a full account of the reproduction of class inequalities. In developing these arguments, a critique is offered of current theories of ‘individualisation’ in relation to class and the family. The argument is illustrated by two ‘worked examples’; teenage motherhood, and the patterning of mothers’ employment.</description><subject>Class</subject><subject>Cultural Capital</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Families</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Family studies</subject><subject>Inequalities</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Parenthood</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Social Mobility</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0038-0261</issn><issn>1467-954X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtKAzEUhoMoWC_gIxQXuprx5J4sXEit9YYFq1TcHOI0I1OnFycW27c3dUTEhTUQEsj3nXPyE9KkkNK4joYpFUonVoqHlAGoNG4l0_kaaXw_rJMGADcJMEU3yVYIQwCgTOkG2WuVLoSmGw-auRsV5WKHbOSuDH7369wm92ftu9Z5ct3tXLROrpNMUiMTp4F5ablnXkBmjXgaCOWfpBEDoT2ozCk2EKBz6TKag2eaGwneW8tya2nGt8lhXXdaTV5nPrzhqAiZL0s39pNZQMONtUCpieTBn6SiCgTnaiUodSQl1RHc_wUOJ7NqHL-LNA5omWY2QqaGsmoSQuVznFbFyFULpIDL6HGIy4RxmTAuo8fP6HEe1eNafS9Kv_i3h73ubTveoi9rP7hn_2O21X2T2ivCm59_93XVCyrNtcT-TQc78Hh6JS772OMfuEClqg</recordid><startdate>200611</startdate><enddate>200611</enddate><creator>Crompton, Rosemary</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200611</creationdate><title>Class and family</title><author>Crompton, Rosemary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5185-a702e593e2e40c984bd46eb584d47e06ca62d407f5ac1f0e273850ee992f991c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Class</topic><topic>Cultural Capital</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Families</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Family studies</topic><topic>Inequalities</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Parenthood</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Social Mobility</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crompton, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>The Sociological review (Keele)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crompton, Rosemary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Class and family</atitle><jtitle>The Sociological review (Keele)</jtitle><date>2006-11</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>658</spage><epage>677</epage><pages>658-677</pages><issn>0038-0261</issn><eissn>1467-954X</eissn><coden>SORVA4</coden><abstract>This paper seeks to make a contribution to debates on ‘class analysis’, as well as exploring the role of the family in class reproduction. A broad distinction is drawn between primarily ‘economic’ and primarily ‘culturalist’ accounts of class reproduction. It is argued that despite their differences, these accounts also share many similarities. In particular, both approaches identify the role of the family as central to the reproduction of class. However, economic and cultural accounts cannot be integrated into a single ‘theory’, one reason being that the mechanisms whereby economic and cultural capital are transmitted are different. Nevertheless, economic and cultural approaches may be (and should be) used in combination with each other in order to develop a full account of the reproduction of class inequalities. In developing these arguments, a critique is offered of current theories of ‘individualisation’ in relation to class and the family. The argument is illustrated by two ‘worked examples’; teenage motherhood, and the patterning of mothers’ employment.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00665.x</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0038-0261 |
| ispartof | The Sociological review (Keele), 2006-11, Vol.54 (4), p.658-677 |
| issn | 0038-0261 1467-954X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_838990118 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| subjects | Class Cultural Capital Culture Employment Families Families & family life Family Family studies Inequalities Inequality Parenthood Social Class Social classes Social Mobility Socialization Socioeconomic Factors Sociology Theory Values |
| title | Class and family |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T07%3A17%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Class%20and%20family&rft.jtitle=The%20Sociological%20review%20(Keele)&rft.au=Crompton,%20Rosemary&rft.date=2006-11&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=658&rft.epage=677&rft.pages=658-677&rft.issn=0038-0261&rft.eissn=1467-954X&rft.coden=SORVA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00665.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1244364731%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199292729&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1111_j.1467-954X.2006.00665.x&rfr_iscdi=true |