Oral taurine effects on inhibitory behavior: response transients to step-like schedule changes

Rats habituated to DRL 6-s schedules that required response inhibition in order to obtain reward did not alter their total responses or efficiency ratios (response/reinforcement) when placed ad libitum (orally) on 0.9% taurine (1.1 +/- 0.4 g/kg/24-h) relative to controls. In three separate experimen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychopharmacology 1976-01, Vol.49 (3), p.249-252
Hauptverfasser: Persinger, M A, Lafrenière, G F, Falter, H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Rats habituated to DRL 6-s schedules that required response inhibition in order to obtain reward did not alter their total responses or efficiency ratios (response/reinforcement) when placed ad libitum (orally) on 0.9% taurine (1.1 +/- 0.4 g/kg/24-h) relative to controls. In three separate experiments, taurine-administerd rats did show significantly poorer adjustment profiles (higher response/reinforcement ratios) during the 15 min immediately following step-like increases in inhibition time demand to DRL 12 s. The effect was transient and was not signficant in subsequent sessions. Taurine rats had been habituated to a DRL schedule intended to induce "frustration" before and step-change did not differ from the taurine group maintained on the normal DRL schedule. No significant differences were noted between taurine and control groups, either before or after taurine administration or before or after the step-change in inhibition demand, with respect to defecation in the test chamber, daily fluid consumption, body weight or total responses. We concluded that oral taurine may inhibit learning during labile periods of adjustment following sudden changes of input demand but does not influence a well learned or established response pattern. These results imply taurine's role in the brain as a "stabilizer" against short-term input fluctuations.
ISSN:0033-3158
1432-2072
DOI:10.1007/BF00426824