Characterizing the relationship between hyperstoichiometry, defect structure and local corrosion kinetics of uranium dioxide
The ability of the UO 2 fluorite structure to accommodate large amounts of interstitial oxygen in various lattice sites leads to the formation of hyper-stoichiometric phases. The defect structures occurring in hyper-stoichiometric UO 2 + x over the range 0.02 ≤ x ≤ 0.1 have been characterized by SEM...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Electrochimica acta 2010-12, Vol.56 (1), p.53-60 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The ability of the UO
2 fluorite structure to accommodate large amounts of interstitial oxygen in various lattice sites leads to the formation of hyper-stoichiometric phases. The defect structures occurring in hyper-stoichiometric UO
2
+
x
over the range 0.02
≤
x
≤
0.1 have been characterized by SEM/EDX and Raman analyses. The results demonstrate that as the nominal stoichiometry increases from 2.002 to 2.1, the diversity of defective structures existing on the UO
2
+
x
surface also increases. Scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) measurements combined with a theoretical model were used to determine the rate constant for the reduction of the redox mediator ferrocene methanol, acting as a cathodic oxidant to corrode the four UO
2
+
x
specimens. The rate constant was found to vary with location on the surface. Stoichiometric locations, with a well defined fluorite structure, exhibited very low corrosion rates. Higher rates were observed at more non-stoichiometric locations with the highest rates being obtained on locations exhibiting tetragonal distortions as their composition approached UO
2.33. The distribution of rates increases with the degree of nominal non-stoichiometry as the diversity of microstructures existing on the UO
2
+
x
surface increases. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0013-4686 1873-3859 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.09.064 |