Comparison of Gil-Vernet and classic flank approaches to pyelo- and ureterolithotomy

Comparison of Gil-Vernet and classic flank approaches to pyelo- and ureterolithotomy

We review our experience with the posterior approach to the kidney and compare it with the classic flank approach to pyelo- and ureterolithotomy. Our results show a decrease in morbidity with the posterior approach.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 1975-01, Vol.5 (1), p.37-40
Hauptverfasser: Brandstetter, L.H., Schwentker, F.N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Adult
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Humans
Kidney Calculi - surgery
Kidney Pelvis - surgery
Lumbosacral Plexus - surgery
Methods
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
Ureteral Calculi - surgery
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We review our experience with the posterior approach to the kidney and compare it with the classic flank approach to pyelo- and ureterolithotomy. Our results show a decrease in morbidity with the posterior approach.
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/0090-4295(75)90298-8