Clinical validity of hinge position to expansive semi open-door laminoplasty

To evaluate and compare the efficacy and clinical results of cervical expansive open door laminoplasty (EOLP) with different hinge position. From February 2006 to February 2007, a total of 102 cases with cervical spondylotic myelopathy were assessed in this randomized controlled trial. Fifty-seven p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chung-hua wai kʿo tsa chih 2010-08, Vol.48 (16), p.1229-1233
Hauptverfasser: Xia, Ying-peng, Zhang, Xue-li, Li, Hui-nan, Song, Hai-feng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:chi
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate and compare the efficacy and clinical results of cervical expansive open door laminoplasty (EOLP) with different hinge position. From February 2006 to February 2007, a total of 102 cases with cervical spondylotic myelopathy were assessed in this randomized controlled trial. Fifty-seven patients underwent EOLP with the hinge located at the inner margin of the lateral mass classified as wide-open group. Forty-five cases who underwent EOLP with the hinge positioned at the lamina margin served as narrow-open group. The clinical results and radiological examinations of both groups were evaluated 24 months after surgery. There were no significant differences in operation time, bleeding quantity and recovery rate of Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. The incidence of C(5) palsy and severity of axial symptoms in the wide-open group were significantly lower than those in the narrow-open group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in cervical curvature index and range of motion betwe
ISSN:0529-5815