S052: a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer

Background In recent years, robot-assisted surgery using the da Vinci System ® has been proposed as an alternative to traditional open or laparoscopic procedures. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes for open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted rectal resection for cancer. Meth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2011-01, Vol.25 (1), p.240-248
Hauptverfasser: Park, Jun Seok, Choi, Gyu-Seog, Lim, Kyoung Hoon, Jang, You Seok, Jun, Soo Han
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background In recent years, robot-assisted surgery using the da Vinci System ® has been proposed as an alternative to traditional open or laparoscopic procedures. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes for open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted rectal resection for cancer. Methods Two hundred sixty-three patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative resection between 2007 and 2009 were included. Patients were classified into an open surgery group (OS, n  = 88), a laparoscopic surgery group (LAP, n  = 123), and a robot-assisted group (RAP, n  = 52). Data analyzed include operating time, length of recovery, methods of specimen extraction, quality of total mesorectal excision, and morbidity. Results The mean operating time was 233.8 ± 59.2 min for the OS group, 158.1 ± 49.2 min for the LAP group, and 232.6 ± 52.4 min for the RAP group ( p  
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-010-1166-z