Identifying attitudes, beliefs and reported practices of nurses and doctors as immunization providers
pielak k.l., mcintyre c.c., tu a.w., remple v.p., halperin b. & buxton j.a. (2010) Identifying attitudes, beliefs and reported practices of nurses and doctors as immunization providers. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(7), 1602–1611. Title. Identifying attitudes, beliefs and reported practices of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of advanced nursing 2010-07, Vol.66 (7), p.1602-1611 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | pielak k.l., mcintyre c.c., tu a.w., remple v.p., halperin b. & buxton j.a. (2010) Identifying attitudes, beliefs and reported practices of nurses and doctors as immunization providers. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(7), 1602–1611.
Title. Identifying attitudes, beliefs and reported practices of nurses and doctors as immunization providers.
Aim. This paper is a report of a study conducted to examine the attitudes, beliefs, behavioural intentions and self‐reported behaviour of nurses and physicians relating to key immunization behaviours and compare the findings for nurses and physicians.
Background. Immunization is an important and effective public health intervention. Understanding immunization providers’ attitudes and beliefs toward immunization has the potential to improve educational efforts and lead to behavioural change.
Method. A postal survey was conducted with all immunization providers in British Columbia, Canada, in 2005. The survey elicited data on demographics, practice characteristics, attitudes, perceived social norms and perceived behavioural control related to key immunization behaviours.
Results. Responses were received from 344 nurses and 349 physicians. The response rate was 67% for nurses and 22% for physicians. More nurses than physicians thought that administering all recommended vaccines at one visit was important (89·2% vs. 63·2%P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0309-2402 1365-2648 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05326.x |