The use of fall prevention guidelines in German hospitals - a multilevel analysis

Aims  Falls and fall‐related injuries are major problems in hospitals. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of fall prevention guidelines on falls and fall‐related injuries in hospitals. Method  A cross‐sectional study was conducted in German hospitals. Some 28 hospitals participated with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2010-06, Vol.16 (3), p.464-469
Hauptverfasser: Raeder, Kathrin, Siegmund, Ute, Grittner, Ulrike, Dassen, Theo, Heinze, Cornelia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims  Falls and fall‐related injuries are major problems in hospitals. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of fall prevention guidelines on falls and fall‐related injuries in hospitals. Method  A cross‐sectional study was conducted in German hospitals. Some 28 hospitals participated with a total of 5046 patients. Eleven of these hospitals had already implemented a fall prevention guideline, 10 were in the process of developing such a guideline and seven hospitals were not using any fall prevention guideline at all. A standardized questionnaire was used on the individual patient level to obtain details regarding the socio‐demographic background, falls, fall‐related injuries and other problems relevant to nursing. A further questionnaire referred to the use of fall prevention guidelines in the individual hospitals. Data specific to falls were analysed both on hospital level and on ward and patient level by means of a multilevel logistic model. Results  The univariate analyses suggest that patients in hospitals that are using guidelines are more likely to fall [odds ratios (OR) = 1.19, confidential interval (CI) = 0.65–2.18] than in hospitals that do not use any guideline (reference category) or are still in the developing stage (OR = 0.82, KI = 0.77–0.87). If, in a multivariate analysis, the ward level and individual patient variables (age, disorientation, confusion, incontinence) are included, the following results are obtained: the probability of falls in hospitals not using guidelines (reference category) is higher than in hospitals developing a guideline (OR = 0.86, KI = 0.58–1.28) or using a guideline (OR = 0.71, KI = 0.44–1.14). The differences are even more distinct regarding the injuries resulting from a fall that require medical treatment. The probability of these injuries is significantly lower in hospitals using guidelines (OR = 0.27, KI = 0.09–0.85) than in hospitals developing a guideline (OR = 0.61, KI = 0.24–1.54) or not using any guidelines at all (reference category). Conclusion  The present results of the multilevel analysis show that falls and fall‐related injuries can be reduced by the implementation of fall prevention guidelines.
ISSN:1356-1294
1365-2753
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01143.x