Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy for Mild-to-Moderate Heart Failure
In this trial, patients with mild-to-moderate heart failure were randomly assigned to receive an implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) alone or an ICD plus cardiac-resynchronization therapy. Patients in the latter group had lower rates of death and hospitalization for heart failure. The use o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2010-12, Vol.363 (25), p.2385-2395 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this trial, patients with mild-to-moderate heart failure were randomly assigned to receive an implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) alone or an ICD plus cardiac-resynchronization therapy. Patients in the latter group had lower rates of death and hospitalization for heart failure.
The use of implantable cardioverter–defibrillators (ICDs) improves survival among patients who have New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III heart failure with left ventricular systolic dysfunction despite optimal medical therapy.
1
Cardiac-resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves symptoms of heart failure, quality of life, exercise capacity,
2
–
6
and left ventricular function
7
when used in patients with NYHA functional class III or ambulatory class IV heart failure with a wide QRS complex. CRT has also been shown to reduce mortality among patients not receiving an ICD.
8
However, studies have not shown a survival benefit of CRT in patients with NYHA class II . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMoa1009540 |