Post-conflict friendly reunion in a permanent group of horses ( Equus caballus)

Horses living socially may possess mechanisms of conflict resolution in the group. ▶ Data emphasize the importance of social contact between opponents after a conflict. ▶ Reconciliation occurred after a conflict in the horses of our group. Gregarious animals living in permanent social groups experie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioural processes 2010-10, Vol.85 (2), p.185-190
Hauptverfasser: Cozzi, Alessandro, Sighieri, Claudio, Gazzano, Angelo, Nicol, Christine J., Baragli, Paolo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Horses living socially may possess mechanisms of conflict resolution in the group. ▶ Data emphasize the importance of social contact between opponents after a conflict. ▶ Reconciliation occurred after a conflict in the horses of our group. Gregarious animals living in permanent social groups experience intra-group competition. Conflicts over resources can escalate into costly aggression and, in some conditions, non-dispersive forms of conflict resolution may be favoured. Post-conflict friendly reunions, hence reconciliation, have been described in a variety of species. The aim of this study was to explore, for the first time, the occurrence of reconciliation in a group of domestic horses ( Equus caballus) and learn more about strategies used to maintain group cohesion. The behaviour of seven horses living as permanent group in an enclosure for at least 2 years was observed by video for 108 h from June to August 2007. We used a Post-Conflict/Matched Control method to assess the existence of reconciliation and third-party affiliation. Behaviours recorded Post-Conflict, or during Matched Control periods, were classified as affiliative based on previous descriptions of visual communication patterns in horses. The proportion of attracted pairs over total post-conflict situations was significantly greater than the proportion of dispersed pairs, both during dyadic interactions ( p < 0.001) and during triadic interactions ( p = 0.002). The results of the present study show that both dyadic reconciliation and third-party post-conflict affiliative interactions form important social mechanisms for managing post-conflict situations in horses.
ISSN:0376-6357
1872-8308
DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2010.07.007