Comparison of Besifloxacin, Gatifloxacin, and Moxifloxacin Against Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa With Different Quinolone Susceptibility Patterns in a Rabbit Model of Keratitis
PURPOSE:Determine the effectiveness of topical besifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin in treating keratitis caused by 2 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with different quinolone susceptibility profiles. METHODS:Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for each fluoroquinolone....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cornea 2011-01, Vol.30 (1), p.83-90 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | PURPOSE:Determine the effectiveness of topical besifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin in treating keratitis caused by 2 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with different quinolone susceptibility profiles.
METHODS:Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for each fluoroquinolone. Sequence analysis was performed on the quinolone resistance determining regions of the ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin-resistant strain. Rabbit corneas were injected with 10 colony-forming units (CFU). After 16 hours, phosphate-buffered saline, besifloxacin (6 mg/mL), gatifloxacin (3 mg/mL), or moxifloxacin (5 mg/mL) was applied topically every 15 minutes for 5 doses, then every 30 minutes for 14 doses. Eyes were examined pre- and posttreatment. Corneas were harvested for bacterial quantitation.
RESULTS:MICs against the fully susceptible strain were 0.5, 0.25, and 0.5 μg/mL for besifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin, respectively. The MICs against the ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin-resistant strain were 2, 16, and 32 μg/mL for besifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin, respectively. Sequence analysis revealed amino acid mutations in all 4 fluoroquinolone target genes. None of the treatments had an effect on clinical severity of eyes infected with the fully susceptible strain (P > 0.05); however, all were effective at significantly reducing the bacterial CFU in the corneas (P < 0.05). For the ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin-resistant strain, clinical scores of besifloxacin-treated eyes were significantly lower than moxifloxacin-treated eyes (P < 0.037). The quantities of ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin-resistant bacteria recovered from corneas of all treatment groups were significantly lower than those recovered from phosphate-buffered saline-treated corneas (P < 0.05). Besifloxacin-treated eyes had significantly lower CFU recovered as compared with that of gatifloxacin- and moxifloxacin-treated eyes (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS:These results support clinical investigation of the effectiveness of besifloxacin in treating Pseudomonas keratitis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0277-3740 1536-4798 |
DOI: | 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181e2f0f3 |