Baseline von Willebrand factor plasma levels and no-reflow phenomenon after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

Abstract No-reflow phenomenon is associated with a poor prognosis and its underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood. von Willebrand Factor (vWF) is a central molecule in haemostasis which plays an important role in acute coronary syndromes. However its possible role in no-reflow has not been...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cardiology 2010-11, Vol.145 (2), p.230-232
Hauptverfasser: Sgueglia, Gregory Angelo, Niccoli, Giampaolo, Spaziani, Cristina, Cosentino, Nicola, Russo, Eleonora, Andreotti, Felicita, Lanza, Gaetano Antonio, Landolfi, Raffaele, Crea, Filippo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract No-reflow phenomenon is associated with a poor prognosis and its underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood. von Willebrand Factor (vWF) is a central molecule in haemostasis which plays an important role in acute coronary syndromes. However its possible role in no-reflow has not been assessed prior to this study. Quantitative baseline vWF plasma antigen was measured by immunoturbidometric assay in 54 consecutive patients with a first ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction, treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 12 h of symptom onset. Definitions of no-reflow were (1) angiographic: final TIMI flow ≤ 2 or final TIMI flow 3 with a myocardial blush grade < 2; (2) electrocardiographic: lack of ST segment resolution (≤ 50% reduction of ST segment elevation at 90 min). Angiographic and electrocardiographic no-reflow was observed in 32 (59%) and 30 (56%) patients, respectively (only 9 patients had both type of no-reflow). Plasma levels of vWF were significantly higher in patients with angiographic no-reflow but not in those with electrocardiographic no-reflow. Also, vWF was the most powerful independent predictors of angiographic no-reflow (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.1–12.9, p = 0.033). Our results provide new insights into no-reflow pathophysiology with appealing therapeutic implications.
ISSN:0167-5273
1874-1754
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.07.046