Evoked potential augmenting and reducing: The methodological and theoretical significance of new electrophysiological observations

Buchsbaum's (1976) evoked potential (EP) procedure reveals differences in the slope of P100-N140 amplitude changes with variation of stimulus luminance. Subjects are classed ‘augmenters’ or ‘reducers’, respectively, if their slopes are positive or negative. Psychological correlates of this slope index have been reported and it has distinguished psychiatric patient populations from healthy subjects. Data are presented which indicate that the augmenting-reducing slope differences are due to an early slow-wave. For augmenters, the major slow-wave deflection is of positive polarity. At the highest luminance, with a correspondingly shorter latency, the slow-wave increases the positive-going P100 deflection. At the lowest luminance, with a longer latency, it reduces the negative-going N140 deflection. This results in positive slopes. For reducers, the major slow-wave deflection is of negative polarity. This influences the measured P100 and N140 amplitudes in a manner opposite to that described for augmenters and results in negative slopes. Since these findings provide new insights concerning the nature of the Buchsbaum augmenting-reducing phenomenon, they have methodological and theoretical implications. it is concluded that the Buchsbaum procedure is an effective measure of slow-wave differences but that the reducing effect is difficult to explain in terms of Pavlov's concept of protective inhibition. An alternative ‘opponent-process’ explanation is offered.