Plasma Protein Binding of Warfarin: Methodological Considerations
Recent theoretical work has suggested that radiochemical impurities can significantly alter the binding results for highly protein-bound drugs. We compared protein binding of warfarin by ultrafiltration and equilibrium dialysis with 98% radiochemically pure [14C]warfarin. Ultrafiltration and equilib...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pharmaceutical sciences 1984-07, Vol.73 (7), p.1000-1001 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Recent theoretical work has suggested that radiochemical impurities can significantly alter the binding results for highly protein-bound drugs. We compared protein binding of warfarin by ultrafiltration and equilibrium dialysis with 98% radiochemically pure [14C]warfarin. Ultrafiltration and equilibrium dialysis were performed at 37°C and pH 7.45 on the plasma of patients receiving chronic warfarin therapy. Binding to plasma from seven patients was measured in duplicate by both a nonspecific radioisotopic technique and a specific HPLC technique. The nonspecific technique gave percentage of free warfarin values of 1.84 ± 0.11 (mean ± SD) and 1.59 ± 0.14 for ultrafiltration and equilibrium dialysis, respectively. The HPLC procedure yielded a percentage of free warfarin by ultrafiltration of 0.969 ± 0.203 and a value of 0.690 ± 0.095 by equilibrium dialysis (p < 0.05). The HPLC procedure for protein binding was performed on plasma samples from 12 additional patients and yielded a percentage of free warfarin of 1.01 ± 0.69 by ultrafiltration and 0.44 ± 0.34 by equilibrium dialysis (p < 0.05). It can be concluded that radiochemical impurities may lead to significant overestimation of the percentage of free warfarin. Ultrafiltration yielded a higher percentage of free warfarin than did equilibrium dialysis, but the ability to distinguish binding differences among patients was similar. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3549 1520-6017 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jps.2600730738 |