Emergency skill training—A randomized controlled study on the effectiveness of the 4-stage approach compared to traditional clinical teaching

Abstract Introduction The “4-stage approach” has been widely accepted for practical skill training replacing the traditional 2 stages (“see one, do one”). However, the superior effectiveness of the 4-stage approach was never proved. Objectives To evaluate whether skill training with the 4-stage appr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Resuscitation 2010-12, Vol.81 (12), p.1692-1697
Hauptverfasser: Greif, Robert, Egger, Lars, Basciani, Reto M, Lockey, Andrew, Vogt, Andreas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction The “4-stage approach” has been widely accepted for practical skill training replacing the traditional 2 stages (“see one, do one”). However, the superior effectiveness of the 4-stage approach was never proved. Objectives To evaluate whether skill training with the 4-stage approach results in shorter performance time needed for a successful percutaneous needle-puncture cricothyroidotomy, and consequently in a reduced number of attempts needed to perform the skill in
ISSN:0300-9572
1873-1570
DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.09.478