Emergency skill training—A randomized controlled study on the effectiveness of the 4-stage approach compared to traditional clinical teaching
Abstract Introduction The “4-stage approach” has been widely accepted for practical skill training replacing the traditional 2 stages (“see one, do one”). However, the superior effectiveness of the 4-stage approach was never proved. Objectives To evaluate whether skill training with the 4-stage appr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Resuscitation 2010-12, Vol.81 (12), p.1692-1697 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Introduction The “4-stage approach” has been widely accepted for practical skill training replacing the traditional 2 stages (“see one, do one”). However, the superior effectiveness of the 4-stage approach was never proved. Objectives To evaluate whether skill training with the 4-stage approach results in shorter performance time needed for a successful percutaneous needle-puncture cricothyroidotomy, and consequently in a reduced number of attempts needed to perform the skill in |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-9572 1873-1570 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.09.478 |