Guidelines for comprehensive quality assurance in brachytherapy

Brachytherapy treatment techniques can provide significant improvement in local control and overall survival, but only when quality assurance can be guaranteed. In the absence of well-trained personnel and inadequate equipment undesirable results usually follow. To establish brachytherapy quality as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 1984-06, Vol.10, p.111-114
Hauptverfasser: Goldson, Alfred L., Rao Nibhanupudy, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Brachytherapy treatment techniques can provide significant improvement in local control and overall survival, but only when quality assurance can be guaranteed. In the absence of well-trained personnel and inadequate equipment undesirable results usually follow. To establish brachytherapy quality assurance, basic requirements for three predetermined subdivisions of clinical institutions will be forwarded. These are: (1) centers having minimum requirements to provide brachytherapy, (2) intermediate centers such as regional or community hospitals, and (3) optimal centers such as university hospitals and cancer centers. A minimum center would have no board certified radiation personnel, would make use of services of a gynecologist or surgeon, be limited to afterloading or remote afterloading techniques for uterus cancer, and quality control would be guaranteed by using simple treatment protocols with fixed intrauterine applicators. Additional quality assurance such as leak testing, etc. would be provided by a parent organization (W.H.O. or Optimal Center). An intermediate center would have at least one certified radiation personnel with expansion of brachytherapy techniques to interstitial implants with several isotopes. Like the minimum center, no teaching would be provided but some quality assurance policies would be performed at the center (e.g., autoradiographs). The optimal center would have a full complement of personnel, have total brachytherapy capabilities, have teaching programs for its staff and possibly the minimum and intermediate centers and be able to provide its own quality assurance. This presentation will highlight personnel needs, equipment requirements, academic activities, clinical experience with these systems and proposed quality assurance guidelines.
ISSN:0360-3016
1879-355X
DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(84)90458-9