Hormonal control of sexual and scent marking behaviors of male gerbils in relation to the sexually dimorphic area of the hypothalamus

The sexual and scent marking behaviors of male gerbils are stimulated by testosterone (T) action in the preoptic area (POA) of the hypothalamus. The sexually dimorphic area (SDA) in the posterior POA, which also responds to T, is implicated in this process. This research studied the sensitivities of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hormones and behavior 1987-09, Vol.21 (3), p.331-346
Hauptverfasser: Yahr, Pauline, Stephens, David R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The sexual and scent marking behaviors of male gerbils are stimulated by testosterone (T) action in the preoptic area (POA) of the hypothalamus. The sexually dimorphic area (SDA) in the posterior POA, which also responds to T, is implicated in this process. This research studied the sensitivities of mating, marking, and the SDA to T metabolites and other steroids. Experiment 1 focused on mating. Male gerbils were implanted at castration with 2-mm Silastic capsules containing T, dihydrotestostrone (DHT), 19-nortestosterone (19-nor T), estradiol (E), or no hormone and were tested 3–7 weeks later. T, E, and 19-nor T maintained intromissions, but E-treated males rarely ejaculated. Controls and DHT-treated males stopped mounting. Experiment 2 compared the ability of these steroids to reinstate marking and mating using the same dose and a larger one (5 mm). Androstenedione, 19-hydroxytestosterone (19-OHT), and E plus DHT were studied as well. Volumes of the SDA and SDA pars compacta (SDApc) were also measured. Only T, 19-nor T, E, and E + DHT reinstated sexual behavior, but all steroids except 19-OHT stimulated marking. E and DHT synergized to elicit mating. For marking, they were no more effective together than alone. Steroid-treated males had larger SDAs than controls. Moreover, steroids that stimulated sexual activity produced larger SDAs than steroids that did not. SDA size correlated with copulatory rate, but not with copulatory efficiency. SDApc size correlated with copulatory efficiency, but not with copulatory rate. Like copulatory rate and efficiency, sizes of the SDA and SDApc did not correlate with each other.
ISSN:0018-506X
1095-6867
DOI:10.1016/0018-506X(87)90018-3