Classification of normal colorectal mucosa and adenocarcinoma by morphometry

Semi‐automatic image analysis was used to make a morphometrical assessment of 15 nuclear and cellular variables in normal (n=20) and malignant (n=30) colorectal epithelium. Principal components analysis on the matrix of correlations between variables identified four main sources of variation within...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Histopathology 1987-09, Vol.11 (9), p.901-911
Hauptverfasser: HAMILTON, P.W., ALLEN, D.C., WATT, P.C.H., PATTERSON, C.C., BIGGART, J.D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Semi‐automatic image analysis was used to make a morphometrical assessment of 15 nuclear and cellular variables in normal (n=20) and malignant (n=30) colorectal epithelium. Principal components analysis on the matrix of correlations between variables identified four main sources of variation within the dataset. These were, in decreasing order of importance: (1) nuclear size, nuclear cytoplasmic ratio and nuclear position within the cell; (2) the variability of nuclear size; (3) nuclear elongation and polarity; (4) nuclear shape and its variation. Discriminant analysis was conducted between histologi‐cally normal mucosa (n=10) and adenocarcinoma in ulcerative colitis (n=20). Using stepwise variable selection, the mean nuclear cytoplasmic ratio (normal, mean 20.4 (s.d. ± 2.0); tumour, mean 39.7 (s.d. ± 7.0)) and the coefficient of variation of nucleus to cell apex distance (normal, mean 19.2 (s.d ± 7.5); tumour, mean 47.8 (s.d. ± 9.1)) were chosen as discriminating features. They were used to derive a discriminant function which gave perfect discriminating between the two groups. Scatter plots of these two variables confirmed complete separation of normal mucosa from adenocarcinoma and provided a simple method of applying the discriminant function. Discriminatory performance did not deteriorate when the function was applied to further normals (n=10) and adenocarcinoma (n=10). This study highlights the descriptive differences between normal and malignant colorectal epithelium and shows that case allocation may be made to these two lesion categories using a morphometrically‐derived classification rule.
ISSN:0309-0167
1365-2559
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2559.1987.tb01897.x