Enthalpy and entropy changes for the intercalation of small molecules to DNA. II. Ethidium and propidium fluoride
Enthalpy changes (ΔHB) for the binding of ethidium (a monocation) and propidium (a dication) to calf thymus DNA have been determined calorimetrically in piperazine‐N, N′‐bis(2‐ethanesulfonic acid) buffer with the fluoride ion as the counterion. Heats of dilution for the fluoride salts of ethidium an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biopolymers 1987-08, Vol.26 (8), p.1347-1355 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Enthalpy changes (ΔHB) for the binding of ethidium (a monocation) and propidium (a dication) to calf thymus DNA have been determined calorimetrically in piperazine‐N, N′‐bis(2‐ethanesulfonic acid) buffer with the fluoride ion as the counterion. Heats of dilution for the fluoride salts of ethidium and propidium were substantially less than the corresponding values found for other halide salts of these cations. At a Na+ ion concentrations of 0.019, ΔHB = −8.3 and −7.9 ± 0.3 kcal mol−1 for ethidium and propidium, respectively. For these two cations, just as was observed for the naphthalene monoimide (monocation) and diimide (dication) [H. P. Hopkins, K. A. Stevenson, and W. D. Wilson, (1986) J. Sol. Chem. 15, 563–579], ΔHB is within the same experimental error for both cations. Apparently, charge–charge interactions in DNA–cation complexes produce only small changes in the enthalpy for the system. In the concentration range 0.019–0.207, the ΔHB values for propidium did not depend appreciably on the Na+ ion concentration, and a similar pattern was shown to exist for ethidium. When these results were combined with ΔGB values for the binding of these cations to DNA, we found the variation of ΔSB with Na+ ion concentration to be remarkably close to the predictions of modern polyelectrolyte theory, i.e., propidium binding to DNA causes approximately twice as many Na+ ions to be released into the bulk solution as does the binding of ethidium. The much stronger binding of propidium, relative to ethidium, at low ionic strengths is thus seen to be primarily due to entropic effects. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0006-3525 1097-0282 |
DOI: | 10.1002/bip.360260810 |