Jaundice: Clinical Pearls and Perils Revisited
I recount some clinical “pearls and perils” to help reassess the contributions of abdominal ultrasound, cholangiography, needle biopsy of the liver, and laparoscopy. Abdominal ultrasound demonstrates stones in the gallbladder in ∼98% of cases, but in only 15% in the common bile duct, whereas compute...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical gastroenterology 1987-08, Vol.9 (4), p.383-385 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | I recount some clinical “pearls and perils” to help reassess the contributions of abdominal ultrasound, cholangiography, needle biopsy of the liver, and laparoscopy. Abdominal ultrasound demonstrates stones in the gallbladder in ∼98% of cases, but in only 15% in the common bile duct, whereas computerized tomography scan reveals them in ≥50%. On cholangiography a blood clot (in hemobilia) may closely resemble a common duct stone, as may spasm or tumor of the distal duct. Iatrogenic stricture at the junction of the left and right hepatic ducts may be indistinguishable from a Klatskin tumor. Differentiation of extrahepatic from intrahepatic cholestasis is frequently impossible in needle specimens of the liver. Needle biopsy provides the best means of establishing a diagnosis of alcoholic hepatitis. Laparoscopy is particularly valuable in the diagnosis of cirrhosis missed in blind biopsy specimens. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0192-0790 1539-2031 |
DOI: | 10.1097/00004836-198708000-00005 |