More on Labeling of Hypertensive Patients
To the Editor: Sackett and his co-workers recently reviewed nine publications related to the phenomenon of labeling hypertensive patients (Nov. 17 issue), and concluded with an apparent paradox. Hypertension-screening programs that contact the smallest proportion of eligible subjects appear to do th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 1984-04, Vol.310 (17), p.1126-1126 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:
Sackett and his co-workers recently reviewed nine publications related to the phenomenon of labeling hypertensive patients (Nov. 17 issue), and concluded with an apparent paradox. Hypertension-screening programs that contact the smallest proportion of eligible subjects appear to do the most good, or at least do the least harm.
Although we share these investigators' concern that selection bias may distort any clinical trial, we believe that several additional issues confound trials of labeling effects and may have at least as great a role in distorting results.
First of all, atypical populations may yield atypical results. Haynes et al. . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJM198404263101726 |