Variation in Visual Field Measurements with an Automated Perimeter
Using the Octopus automated perimeter, we conducted visual measurements on four separate occasions during a four-week period in six subjects with normal eyes. In 11 of 12 eyes, we found at least one point at which the threshold for light detection determined for that point showed a variance of more...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of ophthalmology 1984-03, Vol.97 (3), p.328-331 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Using the Octopus automated perimeter, we conducted visual measurements on four separate occasions during a four-week period in six subjects with normal eyes. In 11 of 12 eyes, we found at least one point at which the threshold for light detection determined for that point showed a variance of more than 4 dB between tests. Thus, automated visual fields must be interpreted cautiously because an apparent pathologic change may only represent normal variation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9394 1879-1891 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90631-7 |