Fractured Femur in Infancy: The Role of Child Abuse

SUMMARYAnalysis of 80 femoral fracture episodes in children under 4 years of age revealed that 8.5% were due to violent trauma, 12.5% were “pathologic” fractures, 30% were related to child abuse, and 49% resulted from normal trauma to normal children. Child abuse as a cause of femoral fracture is mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric orthopaedics 1983-11, Vol.3 (5), p.583-586
Hauptverfasser: Beals, Rodney K, Tufts, Emily
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:SUMMARYAnalysis of 80 femoral fracture episodes in children under 4 years of age revealed that 8.5% were due to violent trauma, 12.5% were “pathologic” fractures, 30% were related to child abuse, and 49% resulted from normal trauma to normal children. Child abuse as a cause of femoral fracture is more common in children under 1 year of age, first-born children, those with preexisting brain damage, and those with bilateral fractures. The fracture configuration was not usually pathognomonic of abuse, although fractures at the subtrochanteric level and chip fracture of the distal metaphysis were more common in abused children. This study suggests that if there is a reasonable history of cause of fracture, appropriate timing in seeking medical care, and no evidence of additional trauma, further evaluation will not be likely to provide evidence of abuse. If any of these criteria is lacking, a skeletal survey and further evaluation are indicated.
ISSN:0271-6798
1539-2570
DOI:10.1097/01241398-198311000-00004