Sexual abuse allegations in child custody disputes

Described is how the rise of the "child's best interest" criterion has encouraged mothers & fathers to contest custody, sometimes by accusing each other of sexual abuse of the child. The task of discriminating between probable & improbable allegations is difficult for the cour...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of law and psychiatry 1991, Vol.14 (3), p.269-286
Hauptverfasser: Elterman, Michael F., Ehrenberg, Marion F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Described is how the rise of the "child's best interest" criterion has encouraged mothers & fathers to contest custody, sometimes by accusing each other of sexual abuse of the child. The task of discriminating between probable & improbable allegations is difficult for the courts. At the heart of this issue is the extent to which children tell the truth in matters relating to sexual abuse, or whether they can be influenced by a parent to fabricate an allegation. Anecdotal evidence & research review suggest that the improbability rate is higher in cases of custody & access disputes than when custody &/or access are not being contested. Recommendations are made for the evaluative process. 73 References. Modified AA
ISSN:0160-2527
1873-6386
DOI:10.1016/0160-2527(91)90008-B