Immunotherapy decreases antigen-induced eosinophil cell migration into the nasal cavity

We investigated the effect of immunotherapy (IT) on eosinophil (EOS) migration into the nasal cavity after nasal provocation with ragweed antigen and during seasonal exposure. In the first study, three groups of subjects participated: one group with no treatment (N = 19), one group with 10 months of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 1991-07, Vol.88 (1), p.27-32
Hauptverfasser: Furin, Mark J., Norman, Philip S., Creticos, Peter S., Proud, David, Kagey-Sobotka, Anne, Lichtenstein, Lawrence M., Naclerio, Robert M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We investigated the effect of immunotherapy (IT) on eosinophil (EOS) migration into the nasal cavity after nasal provocation with ragweed antigen and during seasonal exposure. In the first study, three groups of subjects participated: one group with no treatment (N = 19), one group with 10 months of IT, reaching maintenance at 2 μg of Arab a I (antigen E) (N = 15), and one group with 22 months of IT, reaching maintenance at 24 μg of Amb a I (N = 10). The percent of EOSs in nasal lavages performed during December before and 24 hours after nasal challenge with ragweed extract was determined. No significant difference between groups existed before challenge. The no-treatment group demonstrated a significant increase in the percent of EOSs from 26% to 69.5% p < 0.008), whereas the treated groups demonstrated no significant change. In the second study, 45 patients were divided into four groups based on maintenance dose in micrograms of Amb a I and duration of treatment: (1) no treatment (N = 15), (2) 1 year at 2 μg (N = 13), (3) 2 years at 2 μg (N = 11), and (4) 3 years at 24 μg (N = 9). Nasal mucosal brushings were done during the ragweed season. A significantly smaller percentage of EOSs in 3-year IT-treated individuals was obtained compared to the control group (18 versus 8.4; p < 0.04). The smaller dose of IT, regardless of duration, did not reveal a reduction compared to that in the no-treatment group. These studies provide evidence that IT modifies the eosinophilic response to antigen exposure and demonstrate a parallel between in vivo provocation and seasonal exposure.
ISSN:0091-6749
1097-6825
DOI:10.1016/0091-6749(91)90297-2