Field testing: assessment of physical fitness of disabled adults
The objectives of this investigation were (i) to develop simple field-test procedures for examining the cardio-respiratory and muscular strength fitness of lower-limb disabled individuals and (ii) to compare fitness levels across disabilities and physical activity levels. Forty-nine disabled adults...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 1983-01, Vol.51 (1), p.109-120 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The objectives of this investigation were (i) to develop simple field-test procedures for examining the cardio-respiratory and muscular strength fitness of lower-limb disabled individuals and (ii) to compare fitness levels across disabilities and physical activity levels. Forty-nine disabled adults (42 males and 7 females) were classified according to (i) functional and/or muscular deficit and, (ii) level of habitual physical activity. A forearm ergometer test was used to determine peak oxygen intake (VO2 peak). Sex-specific regression equations developed from the direct test were used in conjunction with a modified Astrand-Ryhming equation to predict VO2 peak from sub-maximal test results. Likewise, an equation was developed to predict isokinetic upper body strength (UBS) from cable tensiometry and hand grip force. The predictive power of the sub-maximal ergometer test was fair (r = 0.67), while the isometric strength measurements were relatively effective in predicting isokinetic total UBS (r = 0.82). Class 1 differed significantly from all other classes with respect to VO2 peak and UBS. The more active individuals also achieved significantly higher scores (p less than 0.05) for both variables. This study shows that an estimate of peak oxygen intake and UBS can be obtained from simple field tests and that active disabled individuals are more fit than their inactive counterparts. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0301-5548 1439-6319 1439-6327 |
DOI: | 10.1007/BF00952543 |