Inability of cytoplasmic or nuclear androgen receptor content or distribution to distinguish benign from carcinomatous human prostate

We used exchange saturation analysis at 15 degrees to quantitate total cytoplasmic and nuclear androgen receptor content of 70 patient specimens. Cytoplasmic androgen receptor contents (fmol/mg DNA) for eight specimens of clinically benign hyperplasia, 14 specimens of histologically hyperplastic pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 1983-08, Vol.43 (8), p.3691-3695
Hauptverfasser: SHAIN, S. A, GORELIC, L. S, KLIPPER, R. W, RAMZY, I, NOVICKI, D. E, RADWIN, H. M, LAMM, D. L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We used exchange saturation analysis at 15 degrees to quantitate total cytoplasmic and nuclear androgen receptor content of 70 patient specimens. Cytoplasmic androgen receptor contents (fmol/mg DNA) for eight specimens of clinically benign hyperplasia, 14 specimens of histologically hyperplastic prostate obtained at cystoprostatectomy, and carcinomatous and noncarcinomatous prostate obtained at radical prostatectomy for prostatic carcinoma, 48 specimens, respectively, were 830 +/- 165 (mean +/- S.E.), 890 +/- 445, 955 +/- 240, and 750 +/- 95. Nuclear androgen receptor contents of these same specimens, respectively, were 275 +/- 40, 235 +/- 30, 345 +/- 25, and 350 +/- 30; whereas, the values of the cytoplasmic/nuclear receptor content, respectively, were 3.25 +/- 0.55, 3.05 +/- 0.80, 2.50 +/- 0.50, and 2.80 +/- 0.40. Multiway analyses of variance of these cross-sectional data showed that there was no significant difference (p greater than 0.05) between group mean values. This result principally reflects the fact that the families of values for the four tissue groups were highly heterogenous with broad overlap. The results would not appear to be unduly influenced by carcinomatous epithelial cell content of the specimens, because cytoplasmic and nuclear androgen receptor content were not related to specimen carcinomatous epithelial cell content. Paired analyses of receptor content in carcinomatous and noncarcinomatous prostate specimens from the same prostate showed enhanced or unchanged receptor content in 58% (cytoplasmic) and 62% (nuclear) of specimens. Our studies show that cross-sectional analyses of androgen receptor content fail to distinguish carcinomatous prostate from noncarcinomatous prostate. However, paired analyses of these tissues from the same gland identify distinguishing differences. The clinical relevance of these observations remains to be examined.
ISSN:0008-5472
1538-7445