The strength of a posterior element claw at one versus two spinal levels

In the Cotrel-Dubousset and Texas Scottish Rite Hospital spinal implants systems, the upper hook on the convex rod is usually clawed to prevent posterior pull out. A transverse process hook and an upwardly directed pedicle hook are usually inserted on the same lamina level. However, clawing two leve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of spinal disorders 1990-09, Vol.3 (3), p.259-261
Hauptverfasser: Roach, J W, Ashman, R B, Allard, R N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In the Cotrel-Dubousset and Texas Scottish Rite Hospital spinal implants systems, the upper hook on the convex rod is usually clawed to prevent posterior pull out. A transverse process hook and an upwardly directed pedicle hook are usually inserted on the same lamina level. However, clawing two levels instead of one is a simpler surgical procedure. We biomechanically compared the posterior pull-out strength of a one-level versus two-level construct. The average load of failure of the double-level construct was significantly greater (p less than 0.05) as compared with the single level. Thus, the two-level construct is not only easier to insert, it is also stronger.
ISSN:0895-0385
DOI:10.1097/00002517-199009000-00011