The strength of a posterior element claw at one versus two spinal levels
In the Cotrel-Dubousset and Texas Scottish Rite Hospital spinal implants systems, the upper hook on the convex rod is usually clawed to prevent posterior pull out. A transverse process hook and an upwardly directed pedicle hook are usually inserted on the same lamina level. However, clawing two leve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of spinal disorders 1990-09, Vol.3 (3), p.259-261 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In the Cotrel-Dubousset and Texas Scottish Rite Hospital spinal implants systems, the upper hook on the convex rod is usually clawed to prevent posterior pull out. A transverse process hook and an upwardly directed pedicle hook are usually inserted on the same lamina level. However, clawing two levels instead of one is a simpler surgical procedure. We biomechanically compared the posterior pull-out strength of a one-level versus two-level construct. The average load of failure of the double-level construct was significantly greater (p less than 0.05) as compared with the single level. Thus, the two-level construct is not only easier to insert, it is also stronger. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0895-0385 |
DOI: | 10.1097/00002517-199009000-00011 |