Gaining a Right to Abortion in the United States and Canada: The Role of Judicial Capacities
Parallels are identified in the history of abortion in Canada & the US. In both countries, technology played a pivotal role in creating dissension on abortion, which caused physicians who were worried about potential medical liability to lobby for reform measures that catalyzed public debate &am...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Berkeley journal of sociology 1991-01, Vol.36, p.93-114 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Parallels are identified in the history of abortion in Canada & the US. In both countries, technology played a pivotal role in creating dissension on abortion, which caused physicians who were worried about potential medical liability to lobby for reform measures that catalyzed public debate & spawned both the right-to-life & the abortion-rights movements. It is argued that differences in court structures & capacities permitted the US abortion reform movement to surmount a variety of legislative obstacles more quickly than the prochoice movement in Canada; Canadians were unable to achieve reform until much later because they could not produce an abortion rights doctrine until 1982, the year the Charter of Rights & Freedoms was written into their Constitution. 30 References. W. Howard |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0067-5830 |