Is the Copper T 380A device associated with an increased risk of removal due to bleeding and/or Pain? --An Analysis

Previous studies have consistently shown that the family of the Copper T 380 devices is more effective in preventing accidental pregnancies than the inert, as well as most other, if not all, copper devices. However, a number of these studies also reported a higher removal rate due to bleeding and/or...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contraception (Stoneham) 1990-08, Vol.42 (2), p.159-169
Hauptverfasser: Chi, I-cheng, Farr, Gaston, Thompson, Karen, Acosta, Manuel, Alvarado, Gloria, Rivera, Roberto, Bandaragoda, J., Betancourt, Jose Delgado
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Previous studies have consistently shown that the family of the Copper T 380 devices is more effective in preventing accidental pregnancies than the inert, as well as most other, if not all, copper devices. However, a number of these studies also reported a higher removal rate due to bleeding and/or pain for the TCu 380A than for other devices. The programmatical importance of these findings prompted us to analyze the international multi-center randomized clinical trial datasets to examine this question on the new TCu 380A (ParaGard ™) recently marketed in the U.S. Our results, while confirming the inherent superior efficacy of the TCu 380A, did not reveal a significantly higher removal rate because of bleeding and/or pain among TCu 380A users than among users of the comparative devices, which included the Lippes Loop D, the TCu 200, the TCu 220 and the Multiload Cu 250 devices.
ISSN:0010-7824
1879-0518
DOI:10.1016/0010-7824(90)90099-H