Is the Copper T 380A device associated with an increased risk of removal due to bleeding and/or Pain? --An Analysis
Previous studies have consistently shown that the family of the Copper T 380 devices is more effective in preventing accidental pregnancies than the inert, as well as most other, if not all, copper devices. However, a number of these studies also reported a higher removal rate due to bleeding and/or...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Contraception (Stoneham) 1990-08, Vol.42 (2), p.159-169 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Previous studies have consistently shown that the family of the Copper T 380 devices is more effective in preventing accidental pregnancies than the inert, as well as most other, if not all, copper devices. However, a number of these studies also reported a higher removal rate due to bleeding and/or pain for the TCu 380A than for other devices. The programmatical importance of these findings prompted us to analyze the international multi-center randomized clinical trial datasets to examine this question on the new TCu 380A (ParaGard
™) recently marketed in the U.S. Our results, while confirming the inherent superior efficacy of the TCu 380A, did not reveal a significantly higher removal rate because of bleeding and/or pain among TCu 380A users than among users of the comparative devices, which included the Lippes Loop D, the TCu 200, the TCu 220 and the Multiload Cu 250 devices. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0010-7824 1879-0518 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0010-7824(90)90099-H |