Reactivity of anti-histone antibodies induced by procainamide and hydralazine
Sera from patients with procainamide (Pr)- or hydralazine (Hy)-induced lupus were examined for anti-histone antibodies by an immunofluorescence assay using histonerecostituted mouse kidney sections and by a solid-phase radioimmunoassay using polystyrene tubes coated with purified histones. Distinct...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical immunology and immunopathology 1982-10, Vol.25 (1), p.67-79 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Sera from patients with procainamide (Pr)- or hydralazine (Hy)-induced lupus were examined for anti-histone antibodies by an immunofluorescence assay using histonerecostituted mouse kidney sections and by a solid-phase radioimmunoassay using polystyrene tubes coated with purified histones. Distinct differences were observed between Pr sera and Hy sera. Pr sera were uniformly positive in the immunofluorescence assay on histone-reconstituted tissue sections, but all Hy sera were negative. In solidphase radioimmunoassay, both Pr and Hy sera showed anti-histone activity with Pr sera demonstrating strong reactions with H2A-H2B histone complex but Hy sera demonstrating weak reactions. The difference in the immunofluorescence assay could in most but not all instances be attributed to this difference in anti-H2A-H2B activity. Antibodies were not detected to DNA or to nonhistone nuclear antigens Sm, nuclear ribonucleoprotein, and
SS-B
La
. The results indicate that both Pr and Hy induce antibodies to histones and that anti-histone antibodies induced by Pr differ both quantitatively and qualitatively from those induced by Hy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-1229 1090-2341 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0090-1229(82)90166-0 |