Double blind comparison of the efficacy of tioconazole and miconazole for the treatment of fungal infection of the skin or erythrasma

Summary A total of ninety‐nine patients, of whom eighty‐six had fungal infections of the skin and thirteen erythrasma, took part in a double blind comparison of the efficacy and acceptability of tioconazole and miconazole creams applied twice daily. The duration of treatment was 4 weeks. Of the pati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical and experimental dermatology 1982-09, Vol.7 (5), p.543-551
Hauptverfasser: CLAYTON, Y.M., HAY, R.J., McGIBBON, D.H., PYE, R.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary A total of ninety‐nine patients, of whom eighty‐six had fungal infections of the skin and thirteen erythrasma, took part in a double blind comparison of the efficacy and acceptability of tioconazole and miconazole creams applied twice daily. The duration of treatment was 4 weeks. Of the patients available for review upon completion of treatment, twenty‐three of thirty‐four patients (68%) treated with tioconazole and twenty‐one of thirty‐eight patients (55%) treated with miconazole were cured clinically and mycologically. Of the patients available for follow‐up 4 weeks later, nineteen of twenty‐one patients (90·5%) treated with tioconazole and twelve of fifteen patients (80%) treated with miconazole remained free from infection. Statistical analysis showed that tioconazole achieved a significantly higher mycological cure rate than miconazole. There was no significant difference between the two creams in clinical or overall cure rates.
ISSN:0307-6938
1365-2230
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2230.1982.tb02473.x