Evaluation of Potential Inductive Effects of Aprepitant on Cytochrome P450 3A4 and 2C9 Activity

The NK1 receptor antagonist aprepitant (EMEND®), developed for use in combination with a 5HT3 receptor antagonist and a corticosteroid to prevent highly emetogenic chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), has been shown to have a moderate inhibitory effect as well as a possible inductive eff...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical pharmacology 2004-03, Vol.44 (3), p.215-223
Hauptverfasser: Shadle, Craig R., Lee, Yih, Majumdar, Anup K., Petty, Kevin J., Gargano, Cynthia, Bradstreet, Thomas E., Evans, Judith K., Blum, Robert A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The NK1 receptor antagonist aprepitant (EMEND®), developed for use in combination with a 5HT3 receptor antagonist and a corticosteroid to prevent highly emetogenic chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), has been shown to have a moderate inhibitory effect as well as a possible inductive effect on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Aprepitant has been noted to produce modest decreases in plasma S(−)‐warfarin concentrations, suggesting potential induction of CYP2C9. Because metabolism of some chemotherapeutic agents may involve CYP3A4, the potential inductive effect of the CINV dosing regimen of aprepitant on this metabolic pathway was evaluated using intravenous midazolam, a sensitive probe substrate of CYP3A4. The time course of induction of CYP2C9 by aprepitant was also evaluated using oral tolbutamide, a probe substrate of CYP2C9. In this double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, single‐center study, 24 healthy subjects were randomized (12 subjects per group) to receive either an aprepitant 3‐day regimen (aprepitant 125 mg p.o. on day 1 and aprepitant 80 mg p.o. on days 2 and 3) or matching placebo. All subjects also received probe drugs (midazolam 2 mg i.v. and tolbutamide 500 mg p.o.) once prior to aprepitant dosing (baseline) and again on days 4, 8, and 15. The ratio (aprepitant/placebo) of the geometric mean area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) fold‐change from baseline for midazolam was 1.25 on day 4 (p < 0.01), 0.81 on day 8 (p < 0.01), and 0.96 on day 15 (p = 0.646). The ratio (aprepitant/placebo) of the geometric mean AUC fold‐change from baseline for tolbutamide was 0.77 on day 4 (p < 0.01), 0.72 on day 8 (p < 0.001), and 0.85 on day 15 (p = 0.05). Assessed using intravenous midazolam as a probe, aprepitant 125/80 mg p.o. administered over days 1 to 3 produced clinically insignificant weak inhibition (day 4) and induction (day 8) of CYP3A4 activity and no effect on CYP3A4 activity on day 15. Assessed using oral tolbutamide as a probe, the aprepitant regimen also produced modest induction of CYP2C9 activity on days 4 and 8, which resolved nearly to baseline by day 15. Thus, the aprepitant regimen for CINV results in modest, transient induction of CYPs 3A4 and 2C9 in the 2 weeks following administration.
ISSN:0091-2700
1552-4604
DOI:10.1177/0091270003262950