Improved Removal of Small Proteins Using Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration to Treat Acute Renal Failure

Continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) or hemofiltration conducted with pre- (CVVHpre) or post- (CVVHpost) dilution modes are recommended to treat patients with acute renal failure (ARF) and cardiovascular instability. The efficiency of the three techniques was compared in a study including 18 c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ASAIO journal (1992) 2004-01, Vol.50 (1), p.81-84
Hauptverfasser: Wynckel, Alain, Cornillet, Josiane, Béné, Bernard, Stolz, Arnaud, Lepousé, Claire, Paris, Bruno, Chanard, Jacques
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) or hemofiltration conducted with pre- (CVVHpre) or post- (CVVHpost) dilution modes are recommended to treat patients with acute renal failure (ARF) and cardiovascular instability. The efficiency of the three techniques was compared in a study including 18 critically ill patients with ARF. Their mean age was 62.1 ± 16.7 years, and their mean SAPS II score was 59.5 ± 14.3. They were treated sequentially with the three techniques for periods of 24 hours each (randomized assignment to one technique the first 24 hours followed by the two others). The PRISMA device and M 100 (AN69S) membrane were used in all instances. Blood and replacement (or dialysis) flow rates were kept at 150 and 25 ml/min, respectively. Urea, creatinine, uric acid, inorganic phosphorus, β2 microglobulin (β2m), and retinol binding protein (RBP) were measured every 12 hours in plasma and in 12 hours filtrate collection for 3 days. The results are expressed as filtrate/mean plasma (F/P) ratio for the 12 hour period. Removal of small molecules was 16% higher using CVVHD and CVVHpost than CVVHpre. For β2m and RBP, CVVHpre was, respectively, 43% and 26% more efficient than CVVHD. CVVHpost gave higher but statistically different removal than CVVHpre only for β2m. CVVHpost was the most efficient technique for removal of small proteins, but this advantage could be easily counterbalanced using higher volume substitution.
ISSN:1058-2916
1538-943X
DOI:10.1097/01.MAT.0000104823.48673.BD