Effect of Breast Augmentation on the Accuracy of Mammography and Cancer Characteristics
CONTEXT Breast augmentation is not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer; however, implants may interfere with the detection of breast cancer thereby delaying cancer diagnosis in women with augmentation. OBJECTIVE To determine whether mammography accuracy and tumor characteristics are d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2004-01, Vol.291 (4), p.442-450 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | CONTEXT Breast augmentation is not associated with an increased risk of breast
cancer; however, implants may interfere with the detection of breast cancer
thereby delaying cancer diagnosis in women with augmentation. OBJECTIVE To determine whether mammography accuracy and tumor characteristics
are different for women with and without augmentation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective cohort of 137 women with augmentation and 685 women without
augmentation diagnosed with breast cancer between January 1, 1995, and October
15, 2002, matched (1:5) by age, race/ethnicity, previous mammography screening,
and mammography registry, and 10 533 women with augmentation and 974 915
women without augmentation and without breast cancer among 7 mammography registries
in Denver, Colo; Lebanon, NH; Albuquerque, NM; Chapel Hill, NC; San Francisco,
Calif; Seattle, Wash; and Burlington, Vt. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Comparison between women with and without augmentation of mammography
performance measures and cancer characteristics, including invasive carcinoma
or ductal carcinoma in situ, tumor stage, nodal status, size, grade, and estrogen-receptor
status. RESULTS Among asymptomatic women, the sensitivity of screening mammography based
on the final assessment was lower in women with breast augmentation vs women
without (45.0% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 29.3%-61.5%] vs 66.8% [95% CI,
60.4%-72.8%]; P = .008), and specificity was slightly
higher in women with augmentation (97.7% [95% CI, 97.4%-98.0%] vs 96.7% [95%
CI, 96.6%-96.7%]; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.291.4.442 |