Evaluation of the coulter LH 750 haematology analyzer compared with flow cytometry as the reference method for WBC, platelet and nucleated RBC count

Summary The Coulter LH 750® is a new haematology analyser with several new features: a count of nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs), automated WBC correction in presence of a flag indicating a cellular interference and a lower incidence of platelet or WBC interference flags when compared with the GEN....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical and laboratory haematology 2004-02, Vol.26 (1), p.1-7
Hauptverfasser: Igout, J., Fretigny, M., Vasse, M., Callat, M. P., Silva, M., Willemont, L., Gelle, M., Lenormand, B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary The Coulter LH 750® is a new haematology analyser with several new features: a count of nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs), automated WBC correction in presence of a flag indicating a cellular interference and a lower incidence of platelet or WBC interference flags when compared with the GEN.S, our current instrument. We had three main goals in our study: evaluating the LH 750 WBC counts when a GEN.S flag suggests a risk of WBC interference, ascertaining whether the platelet counts not flagged by the LH 750 were accurately assessed in samples flagged by the GEN.S and evaluating the NRBC assay provided by the LH 750. Flow cytometry, using CD45 and CD41, respectively for WBC and platelet labelling, was used as a reference method to assess the accuracy of the LH 750 counts. NRBC were identified by double labelling with propidium iodide (PI) and CD45, NRBCs being CD45−/PI+. A significant relationship was found between LH 750 and flow cytometric WBC counts, whether a WBC correction was made by the LH 750 (r = 0.9809, n = 54) or not (r = 0.9901, n = 23). A highly significant relationship was observed for platelets not only in the range from 0 to 450 × 109/l (r = 0.981, n = 108) but also in cases of thrombocytopenia (range: 0–80 × 109/l; r = 0.956, n = 51). In samples with NRBCs, the NRBC percentages given by the LH 750 and by flow cytometry were highly correlated (r = 0.977, n = 60) and WBC counts were accurate. In conclusion, the reduction in flagging by the LH 750, the accuracy of the results, and the availability of a NRBC count, constitute major advantages.
ISSN:0141-9854
1365-2257
DOI:10.1111/j.0141-9854.2003.00577.x