Cost-utility analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery
To undertake cost-utility analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in order to analyze the cost-effectiveness of different chronic sinusitis severity groups. One hundred ninety-two patients with chronic sinusitis were evaluated with a Chronic Sinusitis Survey (CSS) before and 1-year after ESS. Di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery 2004, Vol.130 (1), p.31-38 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To undertake cost-utility analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in order to analyze the cost-effectiveness of different chronic sinusitis severity groups.
One hundred ninety-two patients with chronic sinusitis were evaluated with a Chronic Sinusitis Survey (CSS) before and 1-year after ESS. Direct health care cost data during the first year after operation were retrieved. The utility gain is defined as change in the CSS total score. The cost-utility ratio was defined as cost per utility gain. Patients are stratified by disease severity using the Harvard Staging System.
The average total direct cost attributable to ESS is NT $40,829 in the first postoperative year and the average cost-utility ratio is NT $2194.42. The high cost-utility ratio of NT $3246.45 for pansinusitis cases is due to the higher cost and limited utility gain.
Treating mild and moderate chronic sinusitis are most cost-effective because of their favorable utility gain and relatively reasonable cost. However, there is no proportional linear relationship between disease severity and cost-utility ratio. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0194-5998 1097-6817 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.otohns.2003.07.006 |