Staging of Lung Cancer with Integrated PET–CT

To the Editor: Lardinois et al. (June 19 issue) 1 state that tumor and nodal staging is more accurate with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography (PET–CT) than with CT or PET alone. In their study, PET alone was visually correlated with CT, which is the standard of practice...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2004-01, Vol.350 (1), p.86-87
1. Verfasser: Ollenberger, Glenn P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To the Editor: Lardinois et al. (June 19 issue) 1 state that tumor and nodal staging is more accurate with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography (PET–CT) than with CT or PET alone. In their study, PET alone was visually correlated with CT, which is the standard of practice for reading PET scans. However, Lardinois et al. used non–diagnostic-quality, non–contrast-enhanced CT, which is not the type generally used for correlation at most PET centers. It is not surprising that PET–CT outperformed CT alone in tumor staging, since the tumor stage was determined with the use of non–diagnostic-quality CT. Newer-generation PET scanners . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJM200401013500119