A randomised trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for labour induction

Objective  To compare vaginal misoprostol with dinoprostone for induction of labour. Design  Randomised multicentre trial. Setting  Labour wards of one university hospital and two teaching hospitals. Population  Six hundred and eighty‐one women with indication for labour induction at ≥36 weeks of ge...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2004-01, Vol.111 (1), p.42-49
Hauptverfasser: Gemund, N., Scherjon, S., Le Cessie, S., Schagen van Leeuwen, J.H., Roosmalen, J., Kanhai, H.H.H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective  To compare vaginal misoprostol with dinoprostone for induction of labour. Design  Randomised multicentre trial. Setting  Labour wards of one university hospital and two teaching hospitals. Population  Six hundred and eighty‐one women with indication for labour induction at ≥36 weeks of gestation, singleton pregnancy and no previous ceasarean section. Methods  Misoprostol (25 mcg, hospital‐prepared capsule) in the posterior vaginal fornix, every four hours, maximum three times daily or dinoprostone gel (1 mg) every four hours. Oxytocin was administered if necessary. Main outcome measures  Primary: ‘adverse neonatal outcome’ (5‐minute Apgar score
ISSN:1470-0328
1471-0528
DOI:10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.00010.x