Structured interviews for borderline personality disorder
The authors compared three instruments used to diagnose borderline personality disorder--the Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Patients (DIB), the Schedule for Interviewing Borderlines, and the Structured Interview for DSM-III Personality Disorders--in 56 patients with personality disorders. A bor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of psychiatry 1990-11, Vol.147 (11), p.1522-1525 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The authors compared three instruments used to diagnose borderline
personality disorder--the Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Patients
(DIB), the Schedule for Interviewing Borderlines, and the Structured
Interview for DSM-III Personality Disorders--in 56 patients with
personality disorders. A borderline diagnosis was made according to the DIB
in 30%, the Structured Interview for DSM-III Personality Disorders in 48%,
and the Schedule for Interviewing Borderlines in 55% of the patients.
Diagnostic agreement was only 52%, which has implications for the
generalizability of results of validation studies of the borderline
diagnosis. Improvement in diagnostic agreement requires modification of
current criteria sets and/or the use of dimensional models. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-953X 1535-7228 |
DOI: | 10.1176/ajp.147.11.1522 |