A Comparison of Multimedia and Standard Advanced Cardiac Life Support Learning

. Objectives: To compare student performance after Multimedia ACLS Learning System (MM) education compared with that after standard (ST) ACLS education. Methods: Final‐year medical students were divided into 2 groups based on convenience scheduling and given ACLS instruction either in a standard format or with the MM course. The sizes of the small groups and the times in small‐group instruction were identical. All students were evaluated with the same 50‐item multiple‐choice written examination, a structured evaluation immediately after the management of a mock cardiac arrest, and a second structured evaluation of the same mock arrest (videotaped) by an instructor blinded to the education method. Students were assigned a mark from 1 to 5 in each of 4 domains: assessment, immediate priorities, continual assessment, and leadership. Results: 75 students took the MM and 38 took the ST course. The mean ± SD mark for the multiple‐choice test was 89.3 ± 4.9% (MM) vs 89.3 ± 4.8% (ST); the on‐site mock arrest evaluation mark (20 maximum) was 14.1 ± 2.5 (MM) vs 14.1 ± 2.0 (ST); and the blinded mock arrest evaluation was 13.1 ± 2.9 (MM) vs 14.4 ± 2.9 (ST) (p = 0.024). 1/75 (MM) vs 0/38 (ST) did not successfully complete the on‐site mock arrest evaluation. More students in the MM group (46% vs 25%) required multiple attempts to successfully complete the mock arrest evaluation (p < 0.02). Conclusion: In medical students with no previous ACLS training, structured access to the multimedia ACLS Learning System provides immediate educational outcomes similar to those of a standard ACLS course. Multimedia computer‐interactive learning should be enhanced with a short period of hands‐on practice.