Pedicle screw fixation for arthrodesis of the lumbosacral spine in the elderly: An outcome study

An analysis of the outcome and effectiveness of instrumented arthrodesis of the lumbosacral spine in elderly patients conducted using a review of records, assessment of fusion via plain radiographs, and a two-part questionnaire. To ascertain the outcome and efficacy of instrumented arthrodesis of th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 1998-07, Vol.23 (13), p.1470-1475
Hauptverfasser: GREENFIELD, R. T, CAPEN, D. A, THOMAS, J. C, NELSON, R, NAGELBERG, S, RIMOLDI, R. L, HAYE, W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:An analysis of the outcome and effectiveness of instrumented arthrodesis of the lumbosacral spine in elderly patients conducted using a review of records, assessment of fusion via plain radiographs, and a two-part questionnaire. To ascertain the outcome and efficacy of instrumented arthrodesis of the lumbosacral spine in patients 60 years of age and older. From 1987 to 1991, 38 patients of at least 60 years of age underwent instrumented arthrodesis of the lumbosacral spine using the Wiltse or Selby pedicle screw fixation system (Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc., Irvine, CA). Patients were considered for surgery only after attempts at conservative management, including physical therapy, medication, injection blocks, and home exercises, had proven unsuccessful. Follow-up examinations were performed 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Fusion was assessed using plain radiographs, including flexion-extension films. Inpatient and outpatient records were reviewed, and a two-part questionnaire was used to establish the effect of surgery on function and lifestyle. Thirty patients responded to the questionnaire. Follow-up observation of the patients ranged from 25 to 56 months. The mean age was 73.8 years (range, 60-90 years). The mean co-morbidity was 1.7. Based on the authors' method of evaluation of fusion, the fusion rate was 92%. Fifty-seven percent of the patients reported excellent or good results, 26% reported fair results, and 17% reported poor results. Functional gains of 50% or more were reported by 71% of the respondents. Female patients had significantly more complications than male patients, but reported comparable outcomes. Despite the increase in age, co-morbidity, and associated risk of perioperative complications inherent in this population, an outcome comparable with that of younger patients is reported.
ISSN:0362-2436
1528-1159
DOI:10.1097/00007632-199807010-00008