Impact of a critical pathway on postoperative length of stay and outcomes after infrainguinal bypass

Purpose: To determine the effect of a critical pathway on postoperative length of stay and outcomes after infrainguinal bypass. Methods: A critical pathway for care of patients after infrainguinal bypass was introduced in December 1995 to coordinate postoperative care at our institution. We compared care of 67 consecutively treated patients before institution of the pathway with care of 69 consecutively treated patients with the critical pathway in place. Data collection was done by means of chart review. Univariate analyses were used to identify differences between prepathway and postpathway patients and to identify factors influencing postoperative length of stay. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors that influenced length of stay and to examine the effect of use of the pathway after adjusting for other factors. Results: Patients on the pathway were similar to prepathway controls with respect to comorbid illnesses, vascular risk factors, indications for surgical treatment, type of conduit, and type of operation. Factors associated with longer postoperative stays included distal anastomoses to tibial rather than popliteal vessels ( p = 0.02), preexisting cardiac disease ( p = 0.005), postoperative complications ( p = 0.0003), lower preoperative hematocrit ( p = 0.01), and elevated preoperative creatinine level ( p = 0.006). Overall, pathway patients had somewhat shorter postoperative lengths of stay (median value 7 days; range 2 to 29 days) than prepathway patients (median value 6 days; range 2 to 35; p = 0.01), and the two groups had similar frequencies of postoperative complications, readmission, and 6-month mortality. However, patients on the pathway were more likely to be discharged to an intermediate-care facility rather than directly home. After 12 patients with extraordinarily prolonged postoperative stays were excluded, multivariate analysis indicated that pathway patients had significantly shorter postoperative stays ( p = 0.001). However, the difference was not significant if patients with extraordinarily long postoperative stays were included in the analysis ( p = 0.28). Conclusion: Use of a critical pathway was associated with a modest decrease in postoperative length of stay for most patients. This was accomplished without an adverse effect on readmission, complication, or mortality rates. However, the decrease in stay may have been achieved primarily by discharging more patients to intermediate-care facilities. The pathway did