Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Malaysian Chinese: Salted fish and other dietary exposures

We interviewed 282 histologically confirmed cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in Chinese residents of Selangor and the Federal Territory, Malaysia, and an equal number of Chinese age‐, sex‐, and length‐of‐residence‐matched controls sampled from the general population. Consumption of 55 dietary...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cancer 1998-07, Vol.77 (2), p.228-235
Hauptverfasser: Armstrong, R. Warwick, Imrey, Peter B., Lye, Munn Sann, Armstrong, M. Jocelyn, Yu, Mimi C., Sani, Sham
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We interviewed 282 histologically confirmed cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in Chinese residents of Selangor and the Federal Territory, Malaysia, and an equal number of Chinese age‐, sex‐, and length‐of‐residence‐matched controls sampled from the general population. Consumption of 55 dietary items during childhood, and 5 years pre‐diagnosis of NPC, was analyzed by univariate and multivariate methods. Four salted preserved foods (fish, leafy vegetables, egg and root), fresh pork/beef organ meats and beer and liquor consumption exhibited strong positive associations, and 4 vegetable/fruit combinations strong negative associations with NPC. Factor analysis and multivariable modeling using estimated factor scores strongly supported separate effects on NPC of vegetables/fruits, salted preserved foods, pork/beef organ meats and beer/liquor consumption. Multivariable modeling associated NPC most clearly with high consumption of salted fish, salted eggs, pork/beef liver and beer and low consumption of Chinese flowering cabbage, oranges/tangerines and shrimp. A strong residual association of social class with NPC remained after adjustment for diet, which is consistent with a substantial role for non‐dietary environmental factors. Int. J. Cancer 77:228–235, 1998.© 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:0020-7136
1097-0215
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980717)77:2<228::AID-IJC11>3.0.CO;2-7