Enumeration and identification of airborne viable mould propagules in houses : a field comparison of selected techniques

A number of techniques for the enumeration and identification of viable mould propagules in the indoor air of houses were evaluated in order to document to what extent different results are obtained when different methods are used. A comparison was made between the results obtained with five commerc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Allergy (Copenhagen) 1990-05, Vol.45 (4), p.275-284
Hauptverfasser: VERHOEFF, A. P, VAN WIJNEN, J. H, BOLEIJ, J. S. M, BRUNEKREEF, B, VAN REENEN-HOEKSTRA, E. S, SAMSON, R. A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A number of techniques for the enumeration and identification of viable mould propagules in the indoor air of houses were evaluated in order to document to what extent different results are obtained when different methods are used. A comparison was made between the results obtained with five commercially available air sampling devices (Slit-to agar sampler, N6-Andersen sampler, Surface Air System sampler, Reuter Centrifugal Air sampler, Gelatine Filter sampler) and a non-volumetric sampler (the Open Petri Dish), in combination with four culture media (malt extract agar, dichloran glycerol-18 agar, oxytetracycline glucose yeast extract agar and dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar). The coefficients of variation were high (generally greater than 20%) for all combinations. Statistical analysis showed that the Slit sampler and the N6-Andersen sampler in combination with DG18 and MEA gave the best precision and the highest yield in terms of colony forming units per square cubic meter of air (CFU/m3) and number of species isolated.
ISSN:0105-4538
1398-9995
DOI:10.1111/j.1398-9995.1990.tb00496.x