Dangers of Delay of Initiation of Either Thrombolysis or Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Increasing Use of Primary Angioplasty
We observed treatment delays and suboptimal outcomes when beginning to treat patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with primary angioplasty. Of the 37 patients treated during a 12-month period, 12 (32%) required either emergency bypass surgery or died. Delayed time intervals to balloon rep...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of cardiology 1998-05, Vol.81 (10), p.1173-1177 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1177 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 1173 |
| container_title | The American journal of cardiology |
| container_volume | 81 |
| creator | Doorey, Andrew Patel, Sachin Reese, Charles O’Connor, Robert Geloo, Nadim Sutherland, Sara Price, Nancy Gleasner, Eileen Rodrigue, Roger |
| description | We observed treatment delays and suboptimal outcomes when beginning to treat patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with primary angioplasty. Of the 37 patients treated during a 12-month period, 12 (32%) required either emergency bypass surgery or died. Delayed time intervals to balloon reperfusion (mean 134 minutes) probably contributed to these adverse outcomes, with hemodynamic instability requiring pressors or intra-aortic balloon pumping in 15 patients, 12 (75%) before the first balloon inflation. Eleven of the 12 patients with significant adverse outcomes required such intervention. As angioplasty use increased, time intervals to thrombolysis in those not treated with angioplasty increased from an average of 29 minutes (53% treated less than the national standard of 30 minutes) to 39 minutes (32% treated |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00160-X |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79893987</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S000291499800160X</els_id><sourcerecordid>29692442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-627311c5045d5b0421c1ecccd3719e1510055190fbfc4e0d960f63c9481fcca83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVGL1DAQx4Mo53r6EQ6KiOhDNdM2bfMky92pBycK3uG9hex0spejm6xJK_SL-HlNd5d9EMGnZDK_-c9M_oydAX8HHOr33znnRS6hkm9k-5anJ57fPWILaBuZg4TyMVsckafsWYwPKQQQ9Qk7kTWvZMUX7PeFdmsKMfMmu6BeT_PlytnB6sF6N0eXdrinkN3cB79Z-X6KNtEh-xbsRocpW7q19dtex2HKrMuWOA6UfZk86tBZ3ScxowPuxH4kpRRjIB2tW2e3keYG_1B6zp4Y3Ud6cThP2e3Hy5vzz_n1109X58vrHCuoh7wumhIABa9EJ1a8KgCBELErG5AEAjgXAiQ3K4MV8S6tbeoSZdWCQdRtecpe73W3wf8cKQ5qYyNS32tHfoyqka0sZdsk8OVf4IMfg0uzqaLkpRC1nCGxhzD4GAMZtd2vpoCr2TS1M03NjijZqp1p6i7VnR3Ex9WGumPVwaWUf3XI64i6N0E7tPGIFUUFspyxD3uM0o_9shRUREsOqbOBcFCdt_8Z5A-cyrSq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230355697</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dangers of Delay of Initiation of Either Thrombolysis or Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Increasing Use of Primary Angioplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Doorey, Andrew ; Patel, Sachin ; Reese, Charles ; O’Connor, Robert ; Geloo, Nadim ; Sutherland, Sara ; Price, Nancy ; Gleasner, Eileen ; Rodrigue, Roger</creator><creatorcontrib>Doorey, Andrew ; Patel, Sachin ; Reese, Charles ; O’Connor, Robert ; Geloo, Nadim ; Sutherland, Sara ; Price, Nancy ; Gleasner, Eileen ; Rodrigue, Roger</creatorcontrib><description>We observed treatment delays and suboptimal outcomes when beginning to treat patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with primary angioplasty. Of the 37 patients treated during a 12-month period, 12 (32%) required either emergency bypass surgery or died. Delayed time intervals to balloon reperfusion (mean 134 minutes) probably contributed to these adverse outcomes, with hemodynamic instability requiring pressors or intra-aortic balloon pumping in 15 patients, 12 (75%) before the first balloon inflation. Eleven of the 12 patients with significant adverse outcomes required such intervention. As angioplasty use increased, time intervals to thrombolysis in those not treated with angioplasty increased from an average of 29 minutes (53% treated less than the national standard of 30 minutes) to 39 minutes (32% treated <30 minutes, p <0.001). During the last 2 months of the study period, the time intervals had increased to 48 minutes (14% treated <30 minutes, p <0.0001). There was no change in thrombolytic time intervals at a local community hospital that did not offer primary angioplasty. Emergency Department physician confusion about the best therapy (angioplasty or thrombolysis) was documented in the medical records in 42% of cases (53 of 127). Confusion regarding therapy of AMI led to unacceptable delays in the administration of thrombolytic agents and probably contributed to the adverse outcomes in patients receiving primary angioplasty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00160-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9604940</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJCDAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angioplasty ; Angioplasty, Balloon - standards ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Coronary heart disease ; Emergency Treatment ; Female ; Heart ; Heart attacks ; Humans ; Male ; Medical research ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction - drug therapy ; Myocardial Infarction - therapy ; Thrombolytic Therapy - standards ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 1998-05, Vol.81 (10), p.1173-1177</ispartof><rights>1998 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. May 15, 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-627311c5045d5b0421c1ecccd3719e1510055190fbfc4e0d960f63c9481fcca83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-627311c5045d5b0421c1ecccd3719e1510055190fbfc4e0d960f63c9481fcca83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00160-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2241930$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9604940$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doorey, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Sachin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reese, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connor, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geloo, Nadim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleasner, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigue, Roger</creatorcontrib><title>Dangers of Delay of Initiation of Either Thrombolysis or Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Increasing Use of Primary Angioplasty</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><description>We observed treatment delays and suboptimal outcomes when beginning to treat patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with primary angioplasty. Of the 37 patients treated during a 12-month period, 12 (32%) required either emergency bypass surgery or died. Delayed time intervals to balloon reperfusion (mean 134 minutes) probably contributed to these adverse outcomes, with hemodynamic instability requiring pressors or intra-aortic balloon pumping in 15 patients, 12 (75%) before the first balloon inflation. Eleven of the 12 patients with significant adverse outcomes required such intervention. As angioplasty use increased, time intervals to thrombolysis in those not treated with angioplasty increased from an average of 29 minutes (53% treated less than the national standard of 30 minutes) to 39 minutes (32% treated <30 minutes, p <0.001). During the last 2 months of the study period, the time intervals had increased to 48 minutes (14% treated <30 minutes, p <0.0001). There was no change in thrombolytic time intervals at a local community hospital that did not offer primary angioplasty. Emergency Department physician confusion about the best therapy (angioplasty or thrombolysis) was documented in the medical records in 42% of cases (53 of 127). Confusion regarding therapy of AMI led to unacceptable delays in the administration of thrombolytic agents and probably contributed to the adverse outcomes in patients receiving primary angioplasty.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angioplasty</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon - standards</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Coronary heart disease</subject><subject>Emergency Treatment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - drug therapy</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</subject><subject>Thrombolytic Therapy - standards</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVGL1DAQx4Mo53r6EQ6KiOhDNdM2bfMky92pBycK3uG9hex0spejm6xJK_SL-HlNd5d9EMGnZDK_-c9M_oydAX8HHOr33znnRS6hkm9k-5anJ57fPWILaBuZg4TyMVsckafsWYwPKQQQ9Qk7kTWvZMUX7PeFdmsKMfMmu6BeT_PlytnB6sF6N0eXdrinkN3cB79Z-X6KNtEh-xbsRocpW7q19dtex2HKrMuWOA6UfZk86tBZ3ScxowPuxH4kpRRjIB2tW2e3keYG_1B6zp4Y3Ud6cThP2e3Hy5vzz_n1109X58vrHCuoh7wumhIABa9EJ1a8KgCBELErG5AEAjgXAiQ3K4MV8S6tbeoSZdWCQdRtecpe73W3wf8cKQ5qYyNS32tHfoyqka0sZdsk8OVf4IMfg0uzqaLkpRC1nCGxhzD4GAMZtd2vpoCr2TS1M03NjijZqp1p6i7VnR3Ex9WGumPVwaWUf3XI64i6N0E7tPGIFUUFspyxD3uM0o_9shRUREsOqbOBcFCdt_8Z5A-cyrSq</recordid><startdate>19980515</startdate><enddate>19980515</enddate><creator>Doorey, Andrew</creator><creator>Patel, Sachin</creator><creator>Reese, Charles</creator><creator>O’Connor, Robert</creator><creator>Geloo, Nadim</creator><creator>Sutherland, Sara</creator><creator>Price, Nancy</creator><creator>Gleasner, Eileen</creator><creator>Rodrigue, Roger</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980515</creationdate><title>Dangers of Delay of Initiation of Either Thrombolysis or Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Increasing Use of Primary Angioplasty</title><author>Doorey, Andrew ; Patel, Sachin ; Reese, Charles ; O’Connor, Robert ; Geloo, Nadim ; Sutherland, Sara ; Price, Nancy ; Gleasner, Eileen ; Rodrigue, Roger</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-627311c5045d5b0421c1ecccd3719e1510055190fbfc4e0d960f63c9481fcca83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angioplasty</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon - standards</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Coronary heart disease</topic><topic>Emergency Treatment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - drug therapy</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</topic><topic>Thrombolytic Therapy - standards</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doorey, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Sachin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reese, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connor, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geloo, Nadim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleasner, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigue, Roger</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doorey, Andrew</au><au>Patel, Sachin</au><au>Reese, Charles</au><au>O’Connor, Robert</au><au>Geloo, Nadim</au><au>Sutherland, Sara</au><au>Price, Nancy</au><au>Gleasner, Eileen</au><au>Rodrigue, Roger</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dangers of Delay of Initiation of Either Thrombolysis or Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Increasing Use of Primary Angioplasty</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><date>1998-05-15</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1173</spage><epage>1177</epage><pages>1173-1177</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><coden>AJCDAG</coden><abstract>We observed treatment delays and suboptimal outcomes when beginning to treat patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with primary angioplasty. Of the 37 patients treated during a 12-month period, 12 (32%) required either emergency bypass surgery or died. Delayed time intervals to balloon reperfusion (mean 134 minutes) probably contributed to these adverse outcomes, with hemodynamic instability requiring pressors or intra-aortic balloon pumping in 15 patients, 12 (75%) before the first balloon inflation. Eleven of the 12 patients with significant adverse outcomes required such intervention. As angioplasty use increased, time intervals to thrombolysis in those not treated with angioplasty increased from an average of 29 minutes (53% treated less than the national standard of 30 minutes) to 39 minutes (32% treated <30 minutes, p <0.001). During the last 2 months of the study period, the time intervals had increased to 48 minutes (14% treated <30 minutes, p <0.0001). There was no change in thrombolytic time intervals at a local community hospital that did not offer primary angioplasty. Emergency Department physician confusion about the best therapy (angioplasty or thrombolysis) was documented in the medical records in 42% of cases (53 of 127). Confusion regarding therapy of AMI led to unacceptable delays in the administration of thrombolytic agents and probably contributed to the adverse outcomes in patients receiving primary angioplasty.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9604940</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00160-X</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9149 |
| ispartof | The American journal of cardiology, 1998-05, Vol.81 (10), p.1173-1177 |
| issn | 0002-9149 1879-1913 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79893987 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Aged Angioplasty Angioplasty, Balloon - standards Biological and medical sciences Cardiology. Vascular system Coronary heart disease Emergency Treatment Female Heart Heart attacks Humans Male Medical research Medical sciences Middle Aged Myocardial Infarction - drug therapy Myocardial Infarction - therapy Thrombolytic Therapy - standards Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
| title | Dangers of Delay of Initiation of Either Thrombolysis or Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Increasing Use of Primary Angioplasty |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T01%3A48%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dangers%20of%20Delay%20of%20Initiation%20of%20Either%20Thrombolysis%20or%20Primary%20Angioplasty%20in%20Acute%20Myocardial%20Infarction%20With%20Increasing%20Use%20of%20Primary%20Angioplasty&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Doorey,%20Andrew&rft.date=1998-05-15&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1173&rft.epage=1177&rft.pages=1173-1177&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft.coden=AJCDAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00160-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29692442%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230355697&rft_id=info:pmid/9604940&rft_els_id=S000291499800160X&rfr_iscdi=true |