Dangers of Delay of Initiation of Either Thrombolysis or Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Increasing Use of Primary Angioplasty

We observed treatment delays and suboptimal outcomes when beginning to treat patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with primary angioplasty. Of the 37 patients treated during a 12-month period, 12 (32%) required either emergency bypass surgery or died. Delayed time intervals to balloon rep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 1998-05, Vol.81 (10), p.1173-1177
Hauptverfasser: Doorey, Andrew, Patel, Sachin, Reese, Charles, O’Connor, Robert, Geloo, Nadim, Sutherland, Sara, Price, Nancy, Gleasner, Eileen, Rodrigue, Roger
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We observed treatment delays and suboptimal outcomes when beginning to treat patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with primary angioplasty. Of the 37 patients treated during a 12-month period, 12 (32%) required either emergency bypass surgery or died. Delayed time intervals to balloon reperfusion (mean 134 minutes) probably contributed to these adverse outcomes, with hemodynamic instability requiring pressors or intra-aortic balloon pumping in 15 patients, 12 (75%) before the first balloon inflation. Eleven of the 12 patients with significant adverse outcomes required such intervention. As angioplasty use increased, time intervals to thrombolysis in those not treated with angioplasty increased from an average of 29 minutes (53% treated less than the national standard of 30 minutes) to 39 minutes (32% treated
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00160-X